tor browser android vs do nit track browser

However, we believe that it must be provided by design, as opposed to via a humble request to the adversary that is impossible to audit or enforce, especially outside of the United States.

We believe that the attention surrounding the 'Do-Not-Track' header also indicates that network privacy is an important feature. This is not to mention all of the commercial single-hop VPN and proxy privacy services out there that fail to provide actual browser privacy in their tools. I am told that frequent IP rotation is also the norm for residential connections in Germany and much of the EU to deter services and malware. Arguably they can also obtain low-grade IP privacy simply by tethering to their cell phone, whose IP typically changes regularly. The average user is quite capable of going to a cafe and enabling private mode, and this ability can be explained to them in a single sentence by the UI. Indeed, there are many ways to obtain varying levels of IP address privacy once you have solid browser support for privacy by design. Hopefully, such a mode would be useful for more than just Tor users. To help keep everyone on the same page with respect to this effort, I've decided to take some time to describe what we envision as our ideal private browsing mode. Long term, we'd love to merge these patches upstream, and/or see them obsoleted by better implementations. Updated : Add link to article about 81% consumer polling rate in favor of some form of Do Not Track.Īs I said in my previous post, the Tor Project hopes to work on a set of patches that effectively improves the Private Browsing Mode of Firefox. While ultimately it should be handled identically to the referer, that was not clear in the original text. Updated : Break off window.name into its own linkability issue.

Tor browser android vs do nit track browser